Please Scroll Down to see Community
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

SARMS 12-week versus 16 week sarms

lokanfe

New member
is there really a difference between running sarms for 12 weeks or running them for 16 weeks? Seems like you're adding another 25% to your Cycles cost and also shutting yourself down longer. Is it really worth the benefits because don't you really get the best gains from week for 2 weeks 12 anyway?
 
is there really a difference between running sarms for 12 weeks or running them for 16 weeks? Seems like you're adding another 25% to your Cycles cost and also shutting yourself down longer. Is it really worth the benefits because don't you really get the best gains from week for 2 weeks 12 anyway?
I think the longer your run sarms the better IMO
 
it depends on the sarms you are asking about... the non suppressive sarms such as gw501516, gw0742, sr9009, sr9011 and mk677 can all be ran 16 weeks with no issues whatsoever... the others should be kept to 12 weeks...
 

Similar threads

Top Bottom